Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11101000001100… |
… | …000111101110000 |
3 | 1020221020221012200 |
4 | 131001200331300 |
5 | 1444123431212 |
6 | 120152423200 |
7 | 15031614513 |
oct | 3501407560 |
9 | 1227227180 |
10 | 486936432 |
11 | 22a954604 |
12 | 1170a7b00 |
13 | 79b5cc88 |
14 | 48954d7a |
15 | 2cb376dc |
hex | 1d060f70 |
486936432 has 120 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1394160768. Its totient is φ = 158620800.
The previous prime is 486936431. The next prime is 486936467. The reversal of 486936432 is 234639684.
It is a nude number because it is divisible by every one of its digits.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (486936431) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1565557 + ... + 1565867.
Almost surely, 2486936432 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 486936432, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (697080384).
486936432 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (907224336).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
486936432 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
486936432 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 539 (or 530 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 746496, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 486936432 is about 22066.6361731914. The cubic root of 486936432 is about 786.7270626170.
The spelling of 486936432 in words is "four hundred eighty-six million, nine hundred thirty-six thousand, four hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •