Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110010010000101111… |
… | …000101010110011100 |
3 | 12011022010001211002120 |
4 | 302100233011112130 |
5 | 1341011233304330 |
6 | 40443102422540 |
7 | 3620242214640 |
oct | 622057052634 |
9 | 164263054076 |
10 | 53967869340 |
11 | 20984501010 |
12 | a561891a50 |
13 | 5120b216c8 |
14 | 287d6bcc20 |
15 | 160cdbec10 |
hex | c90bc559c |
53967869340 has 192 divisors, whose sum is σ = 190263886848. Its totient is φ = 11102976000.
The previous prime is 53967869297. The next prime is 53967869353. The reversal of 53967869340 is 4396876935.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (60).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 63 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 408792 + ... + 524448.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (990957744).
Almost surely, 253967869340 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 53967869340, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (95131943424).
53967869340 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (136296017508).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
53967869340 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
53967869340 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 115788 (or 115786 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 29393280, while the sum is 60.
The spelling of 53967869340 in words is "fifty-three billion, nine hundred sixty-seven million, eight hundred sixty-nine thousand, three hundred forty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.081 sec. • engine limits •