Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010111000101000001111… |
… | …010111010000011001011101 |
3 | 101220002002220210222022110220 |
4 | 102320220033113100121131 |
5 | 41341243333320343030 |
6 | 452351315333351553 |
7 | 23331423262541655 |
oct | 2270501727203135 |
9 | 356062823868426 |
10 | 83056335324765 |
11 | 24511aa3020160 |
12 | 9394a5a7985b9 |
13 | 3746242b161ca |
14 | 1671d3b757365 |
15 | 990744ce5a10 |
hex | 4b8a0f5d065d |
83056335324765 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 147709972224000. Its totient is φ = 39508965999360.
The previous prime is 83056335324763. The next prime is 83056335324803. The reversal of 83056335324765 is 56742353365038.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 83056335324765 - 21 = 83056335324763 is a prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 83056335324699 and 83056335324708.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (83056335324763) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 63 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 463386654 + ... + 463565856.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2307968316000).
Almost surely, 283056335324765 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
83056335324765 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (64653636899235).
83056335324765 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
83056335324765 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 232274.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 163296000, while the sum is 60.
The spelling of 83056335324765 in words is "eighty-three trillion, fifty-six billion, three hundred thirty-five million, three hundred twenty-four thousand, seven hundred sixty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.074 sec. • engine limits •