Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011000110110… |
… | …00100111110010 |
3 | 20111022010012100 |
4 | 11203120213302 |
5 | 142322140340 |
6 | 13124441230 |
7 | 2210602146 |
oct | 543304762 |
9 | 214263170 |
10 | 93161970 |
11 | 48650a70 |
12 | 27249216 |
13 | 163bb235 |
14 | c531226 |
15 | 82a3830 |
hex | 58d89f2 |
93161970 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 266535360. Its totient is φ = 22389120.
The previous prime is 93161933. The next prime is 93161977. The reversal of 93161970 is 7916139.
93161970 is a `hidden beast` number, since 9 + 31 + 619 + 7 + 0 = 666.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (93161977) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 137272 + ... + 137948.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2776410).
Almost surely, 293161970 is an apocalyptic number.
93161970 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (90) formed by its first and last digit.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 93161970, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (133267680).
93161970 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (173373390).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
93161970 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
93161970 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 840 (or 837 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 10206, while the sum is 36.
The square root of 93161970 is about 9652.0448610644. The cubic root of 93161970 is about 453.3283586296.
The spelling of 93161970 in words is "ninety-three million, one hundred sixty-one thousand, nine hundred seventy".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.087 sec. • engine limits •