Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101100000100011111… |
… | …1111000101101000000 |
3 | 100001021122022121101022 |
4 | 1120020333320231000 |
5 | 3022310400324233 |
6 | 111251020525012 |
7 | 6560162546201 |
oct | 1301077705500 |
9 | 301248277338 |
10 | 94640245568 |
11 | 37155a51290 |
12 | 164129b0768 |
13 | 8c03290b0b |
14 | 481b2b35a8 |
15 | 26dd91e398 |
hex | 1608ff8b40 |
94640245568 has 112 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 209117184000. Its totient is φ = 42136174080.
The previous prime is 94640245541. The next prime is 94640245603. The reversal of 94640245568 is 86554204649.
It is a happy number.
94640245568 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 7056533 + ... + 7069931.
Almost surely, 294640245568 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 94640245568, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (104558592000).
94640245568 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (114476938432).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
94640245568 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
94640245568 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 13628 (or 13618 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 8294400, while the sum is 53.
The spelling of 94640245568 in words is "ninety-four billion, six hundred forty million, two hundred forty-five thousand, five hundred sixty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •