Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100101010001… |
… | …000011000000 |
3 | 200101022202110 |
4 | 211101003000 |
5 | 10000103102 |
6 | 545215320 |
7 | 146015331 |
oct | 45210300 |
9 | 20338673 |
10 | 9769152 |
11 | 5572788 |
12 | 3331540 |
13 | 2040783 |
14 | 1424288 |
15 | cce86c |
hex | 9510c0 |
9769152 has 112 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 28419552. Its totient is φ = 2949120.
The previous prime is 9769139. The next prime is 9769157. The reversal of 9769152 is 2519679.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 9769152.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (9769157) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (7) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 133788 + ... + 133860.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (253746).
Almost surely, 29769152 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 9769152, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (14209776).
9769152 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (18650400).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
9769152 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9769152 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 146 (or 136 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 34020, while the sum is 39.
The square root of 9769152 is about 3125.5642690561. The cubic root of 9769152 is about 213.7727228673.
The spelling of 9769152 in words is "nine million, seven hundred sixty-nine thousand, one hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.085 sec. • engine limits •