Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10001111011110111011… |
… | …101110010001111110000 |
3 | 11100211022220120112021010 |
4 | 101323313131302033300 |
5 | 130143141140130432 |
6 | 2342113002430520 |
7 | 155021543525640 |
oct | 21736735621760 |
9 | 4324286515233 |
10 | 1232512426992 |
11 | 435784151770 |
12 | 17aa51b02440 |
13 | 8c2c13406a2 |
14 | 439224da520 |
15 | 220d91973cc |
hex | 11ef77723f0 |
1232512426992 has 160 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 3971146973184. Its totient is φ = 320012409600.
The previous prime is 1232512426939. The next prime is 1232512427011. The reversal of 1232512426992 is 2996242152321.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (48).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 9958353 + ... + 10081359.
Almost surely, 21232512426992 is an apocalyptic number.
1232512426992 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 1232512426992, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (1985573486592).
1232512426992 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (2738634546192).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
1232512426992 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1232512426992 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 125747 (or 125741 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 933120, while the sum is 48.
The spelling of 1232512426992 in words is "one trillion, two hundred thirty-two billion, five hundred twelve million, four hundred twenty-six thousand, nine hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.076 sec. • engine limits •