Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10000001101101… |
… | …11001001101010 |
3 | 100110221100112210 |
4 | 20012313021222 |
5 | 234310011430 |
6 | 21255145550 |
7 | 3241056351 |
oct | 1006671152 |
9 | 313840483 |
10 | 136016490 |
11 | 6a861225 |
12 | 396752b6 |
13 | 2224413c |
14 | 140c8998 |
15 | be1b2b0 |
hex | 81b726a |
136016490 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 347929344. Its totient is φ = 33911808.
The previous prime is 136016443. The next prime is 136016509. The reversal of 136016490 is 94610631.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (30).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 84372 + ... + 85968.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5436396).
Almost surely, 2136016490 is an apocalyptic number.
136016490 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 136016490, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (173964672).
136016490 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (211912854).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
136016490 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
136016490 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1791.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3888, while the sum is 30.
The square root of 136016490 is about 11662.6107711781. The cubic root of 136016490 is about 514.2771018179.
The spelling of 136016490 in words is "one hundred thirty-six million, sixteen thousand, four hundred ninety".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.088 sec. • engine limits •