Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101101001001100111100… |
… | …01010001011111011101000 |
3 | 10221020020222122210020002110 |
4 | 12310212132022023323220 |
5 | 12413032121002024000 |
6 | 143451104332202320 |
7 | 6214434211300131 |
oct | 664463612137350 |
9 | 127206878706073 |
10 | 30003000033000 |
11 | 9618223384275 |
12 | 34469480093a0 |
13 | 1398369b357c7 |
14 | 75a21d9a0c88 |
15 | 3706a8377850 |
hex | 1b499e28bee8 |
30003000033000 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 93609360112320. Its totient is φ = 8000800008000.
The previous prime is 30003000032981. The next prime is 30003000033001. The reversal of 30003000033000 is 33000030003.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (12).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (30003000033001) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 5000497006 + ... + 5000503005.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1462646251755).
Almost surely, 230003000033000 is an apocalyptic number.
30003000033000 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (30) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
30003000033000 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (63606360079320).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
30003000033000 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
30003000033000 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 10001000035 (or 10001000021 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 81, while the sum is 12.
Adding to 30003000033000 its reverse (33000030003), we get a palindrome (30036000063003).
The spelling of 30003000033000 in words is "thirty trillion, three billion, thirty-three thousand".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.080 sec. • engine limits •