Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11101101111001111… |
… | …001100011100010000 |
3 | 10001102022212010220210 |
4 | 131233033030130100 |
5 | 1010343320301133 |
6 | 22400252404120 |
7 | 2210165143560 |
oct | 355717143420 |
9 | 101368763823 |
10 | 31931025168 |
11 | 125a625a8a9 |
12 | 6231776640 |
13 | 301b46c443 |
14 | 178caaada0 |
15 | c6d414763 |
hex | 76f3cc710 |
31931025168 has 160 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 100491980800. Its totient is φ = 8533444608.
The previous prime is 31931025151. The next prime is 31931025173. The reversal of 31931025168 is 86152013913.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 472680 + ... + 535992.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (628074880).
Almost surely, 231931025168 is an apocalyptic number.
31931025168 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (38) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 31931025168, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (50245990400).
31931025168 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (68560955632).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
31931025168 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
31931025168 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 63429 (or 63423 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 38880, while the sum is 39.
The spelling of 31931025168 in words is "thirty-one billion, nine hundred thirty-one million, twenty-five thousand, one hundred sixty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.074 sec. • engine limits •