Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011100111110… |
… | …010010101000110 |
3 | 211221102221012200 |
4 | 103213302111012 |
5 | 1133233244440 |
6 | 52355455330 |
7 | 11105061432 |
oct | 2347622506 |
9 | 757387180 |
10 | 329196870 |
11 | 159906532 |
12 | 922b7546 |
13 | 53281362 |
14 | 31a139c2 |
15 | 1dd79c30 |
hex | 139f2546 |
329196870 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 871058448. Its totient is φ = 86258880.
The previous prime is 329196851. The next prime is 329196887. The reversal of 329196870 is 78691923.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (45).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 35 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 334399 + ... + 335381.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (12098034).
Almost surely, 2329196870 is an apocalyptic number.
329196870 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (30) formed by its first and last digit.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 329196870, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (435529224).
329196870 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (541861578).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
329196870 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
329196870 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1118 (or 1054 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 163296, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 329196870 is about 18143.7832328321. The cubic root of 329196870 is about 690.4812647510.
The spelling of 329196870 in words is "three hundred twenty-nine million, one hundred ninety-six thousand, eight hundred seventy".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •