Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100000001000100011… |
… | …100101100101001100 |
3 | 10022001121000111010222 |
4 | 200020203211211030 |
5 | 1031130320110233 |
6 | 23503421050512 |
7 | 2331011040560 |
oct | 401043454514 |
9 | 108047014128 |
10 | 34503285068 |
11 | 136a622882a |
12 | 682b0b6a38 |
13 | 333b34bc15 |
14 | 195456b6a0 |
15 | d6e165898 |
hex | 8088e594c |
34503285068 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 78060648960. Its totient is φ = 12987786240.
The previous prime is 34503285053. The next prime is 34503285073. The reversal of 34503285068 is 86058230543.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 577478 + ... + 634418.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (813131760).
Almost surely, 234503285068 is an apocalyptic number.
34503285068 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (38) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 34503285068, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (39030324480).
34503285068 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (43557363892).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
34503285068 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
34503285068 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 57055 (or 57053 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 691200, while the sum is 44.
The spelling of 34503285068 in words is "thirty-four billion, five hundred three million, two hundred eighty-five thousand, sixty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •