Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11011111001110… |
… | …010001110001110 |
3 | 1012121212121102000 |
4 | 123321302032032 |
5 | 1424320222000 |
6 | 114241413130 |
7 | 14413030341 |
oct | 3371621616 |
9 | 1177777360 |
10 | 468132750 |
11 | 220281078 |
12 | 11093a1a6 |
13 | 75ca8237 |
14 | 4625c458 |
15 | 2b171000 |
hex | 1be7238e |
468132750 has 128 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1308303360. Its totient is φ = 123876000.
The previous prime is 468132739. The next prime is 468132751. The reversal of 468132750 is 57231864.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (468132751) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 63 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1505095 + ... + 1505405.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (10221120).
Almost surely, 2468132750 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 468132750, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (654151680).
468132750 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (840170610).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
468132750 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
468132750 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 560 (or 544 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 40320, while the sum is 36.
The square root of 468132750 is about 21636.3756206995. The cubic root of 468132750 is about 776.4670097368.
The spelling of 468132750 in words is "four hundred sixty-eight million, one hundred thirty-two thousand, seven hundred fifty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •