Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100011111100… |
… | …0011000011000 |
3 | 10122121001222120 |
4 | 3013320120120 |
5 | 101403210332 |
6 | 5111021240 |
7 | 1204241442 |
oct | 307703030 |
9 | 118531876 |
10 | 52397592 |
11 | 276390a5 |
12 | 1566a820 |
13 | ab177c0 |
14 | 6d5d492 |
15 | 490032c |
hex | 31f8618 |
52397592 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 148512000. Its totient is φ = 15272064.
The previous prime is 52397567. The next prime is 52397599. The reversal of 52397592 is 29579325.
It is a zygodrome in base 2.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (52397599) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1509 + ... + 10347.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2320500).
Almost surely, 252397592 is an apocalyptic number.
52397592 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (52) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 52397592, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (74256000).
52397592 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (96114408).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
52397592 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
52397592 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 8880 (or 8876 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 170100, while the sum is 42.
The square root of 52397592 is about 7238.6181001625. The cubic root of 52397592 is about 374.1999940773.
The spelling of 52397592 in words is "fifty-two million, three hundred ninety-seven thousand, five hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •