Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110100010111111001… |
… | …110010101011110110 |
3 | 12101011011012111121100 |
4 | 310113321302223312 |
5 | 1410132303210010 |
6 | 41500112030530 |
7 | 4030366501266 |
oct | 642771625366 |
9 | 171134174540 |
10 | 56235600630 |
11 | 21938592100 |
12 | aa95232446 |
13 | 53c28a9041 |
14 | 2a1694b7a6 |
15 | 16e201a2c0 |
hex | d17e72af6 |
56235600630 has 144 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 160900740000. Its totient is φ = 13616951040.
The previous prime is 56235600611. The next prime is 56235600649. The reversal of 56235600630 is 3600653265.
56235600630 is a `hidden beast` number, since 5 + 62 + 3 + 560 + 0 + 6 + 30 = 666.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (56235600611) and next prime (56235600649).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 71 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 11246871 + ... + 11251869.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1117366250).
Almost surely, 256235600630 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 56235600630, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (80450370000).
56235600630 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (104665139370).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
56235600630 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
56235600630 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 6067 (or 6053 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 97200, while the sum is 36.
The spelling of 56235600630 in words is "fifty-six billion, two hundred thirty-five million, six hundred thousand, six hundred thirty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •