Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101011010001001110… |
… | …1011000010110011000 |
3 | 22212211202020020000010 |
4 | 1112202131120112120 |
5 | 3010300000032440 |
6 | 110404204241520 |
7 | 6466433215602 |
oct | 1264235302630 |
9 | 285752206003 |
10 | 92919924120 |
11 | 36452969321 |
12 | 160128402a0 |
13 | 89baa4aa2a |
14 | 46d6a1c172 |
15 | 263c8a4580 |
hex | 15a2758598 |
92919924120 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 278835909120. Its totient is φ = 24771878784.
The previous prime is 92919924107. The next prime is 92919924121. The reversal of 92919924120 is 2142991929.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×929199241202 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 92919924120.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (92919924121) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 343359 + ... + 551121.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (4356811080).
Almost surely, 292919924120 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
92919924120 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (185915985000).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
92919924120 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
92919924120 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 211504 (or 211500 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 209952, while the sum is 48.
The spelling of 92919924120 in words is "ninety-two billion, nine hundred nineteen million, nine hundred twenty-four thousand, one hundred twenty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.112 sec. • engine limits •