Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011111000000011110000 |
3 | 100210201021000 |
4 | 103320003300 |
5 | 2313212402 |
6 | 303402000 |
7 | 62200350 |
oct | 23700360 |
9 | 10721230 |
10 | 5210352 |
11 | 2a39684 |
12 | 18b3300 |
13 | 1105764 |
14 | 998b60 |
15 | 6cdc1c |
hex | 4f80f0 |
5210352 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 17102080. Its totient is φ = 1487808.
The previous prime is 5210339. The next prime is 5210363. The reversal of 5210352 is 2530125.
It is a happy number.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (18).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2163 + ... + 3885.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (213776).
Almost surely, 25210352 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 5210352, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (8551040).
5210352 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (11891728).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
5210352 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5210352 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 1747 (or 1735 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 300, while the sum is 18.
The square root of 5210352 is about 2282.6195478003. The cubic root of 5210352 is about 173.3627103397.
Adding to 5210352 its reverse (2530125), we get a palindrome (7740477).
It can be divided in two parts, 52 and 10352, that added together give a square (10404 = 1022).
The spelling of 5210352 in words is "five million, two hundred ten thousand, three hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •