Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011001010001001… |
… | …11100111000010010 |
3 | 120110111200100100000 |
4 | 11211010330320102 |
5 | 44232113422200 |
6 | 2430242510430 |
7 | 301312440255 |
oct | 54504747022 |
9 | 16414610300 |
10 | 5990764050 |
11 | 25a46a2777 |
12 | 11b2365416 |
13 | 7461b3bcb |
14 | 40b8c709c |
15 | 250e11300 |
hex | 16513ce12 |
5990764050 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 16691337936. Its totient is φ = 1597533840.
The previous prime is 5990764033. The next prime is 5990764121. The reversal of 5990764050 is 504670995.
It is a happy number.
5990764050 is a `hidden beast` number, since 599 + 0 + 7 + 6 + 4 + 0 + 50 = 666.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (45).
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 5990763987 and 5990764005.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 35 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 234384 + ... + 258683.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (231824138).
Almost surely, 25990764050 is an apocalyptic number.
5990764050 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (50) formed by its first and last digit.
5990764050 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (10700573886).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
5990764050 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5990764050 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 493094 (or 493077 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 340200, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 5990764050 is about 77400.0261627863. The cubic root of 5990764050 is about 1816.1877342919.
The spelling of 5990764050 in words is "five billion, nine hundred ninety million, seven hundred sixty-four thousand, fifty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •