Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10001001000001111… |
… | …01000111001110000 |
3 | 212201212201222111021 |
4 | 20210013220321300 |
5 | 122313123320122 |
6 | 4120300225224 |
7 | 443612001250 |
oct | 104407507160 |
9 | 25655658437 |
10 | 9195916912 |
11 | 3999945536 |
12 | 194783b214 |
13 | b37237c70 |
14 | 633453960 |
15 | 38c4cb1c7 |
hex | 2241e8e70 |
9195916912 has 120 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 22154602848. Its totient is φ = 3600806400.
The previous prime is 9195916889. The next prime is 9195916931. The reversal of 9195916912 is 2196195919.
It is a happy number.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (52).
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 9195916912.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 33198118 + ... + 33198394.
Almost surely, 29195916912 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 9195916912, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (11077301424).
9195916912 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (12958685936).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
9195916912 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9195916912 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 607 (or 450 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 393660, while the sum is 52.
The square root of 9195916912 is about 95895.3435365868. The cubic root of 9195916912 is about 2095.0690743398.
The spelling of 9195916912 in words is "nine billion, one hundred ninety-five million, nine hundred sixteen thousand, nine hundred twelve".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •