Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110101110000000011… |
… | …1111001100010000000 |
3 | 102000221110121211210010 |
4 | 1223200013321202000 |
5 | 3342344401113421 |
6 | 125005534504520 |
7 | 11224306001136 |
oct | 1534007714200 |
9 | 360843554703 |
10 | 115429316736 |
11 | 44a53927138 |
12 | 1a455065140 |
13 | ab67293066 |
14 | 58302bb756 |
15 | 3008aa4076 |
hex | 1ae01f9880 |
115429316736 has 128 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 325132833600. Its totient is φ = 36158701568.
The previous prime is 115429316699. The next prime is 115429316789. The reversal of 115429316736 is 637613924511.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (128).
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (48).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 4445680 + ... + 4471568.
Almost surely, 2115429316736 is an apocalyptic number.
115429316736 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (16) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 115429316736, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (162566416800).
115429316736 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (209703516864).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
115429316736 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
115429316736 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 26606 (or 26594 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 816480, while the sum is 48.
The spelling of 115429316736 in words is "one hundred fifteen billion, four hundred twenty-nine million, three hundred sixteen thousand, seven hundred thirty-six".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.077 sec. • engine limits •