Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101110110110… |
… | …10000110010100 |
3 | 22002201102202200 |
4 | 12323122012110 |
5 | 214224033232 |
6 | 15311204500 |
7 | 2610665325 |
oct | 673320624 |
9 | 262642680 |
10 | 116236692 |
11 | 5a681390 |
12 | 32b16730 |
13 | 1b10a010 |
14 | 1161a44c |
15 | a31077c |
hex | 6eda194 |
116236692 has 144 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 351379392. Its totient is φ = 31933440.
The previous prime is 116236651. The next prime is 116236711. The reversal of 116236692 is 296632611.
It is a happy number.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (36).
It is a nude number because it is divisible by every one of its digits.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 344748 + ... + 345084.
Almost surely, 2116236692 is an apocalyptic number.
116236692 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 116236692, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (175689696).
116236692 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (235142700).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
116236692 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
116236692 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 438 (or 433 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 23328, while the sum is 36.
The square root of 116236692 is about 10781.3121650382. The cubic root of 116236692 is about 488.0313795552.
The spelling of 116236692 in words is "one hundred sixteen million, two hundred thirty-six thousand, six hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •