Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10110010001010010011000… |
… | …01101000110010101011100 |
3 | 20102101201120102101010022012 |
4 | 23020221030031012111130 |
5 | 22404331132334024403 |
6 | 252053353124210352 |
7 | 13213101044262530 |
oct | 1310511415062534 |
9 | 212351512333265 |
10 | 48972495611228 |
11 | 14671134075892 |
12 | 55ab2458399b8 |
13 | 2143118115ca7 |
14 | c143d2383bc0 |
15 | 59dd4892eed8 |
hex | 2c8a4c34655c |
48972495611228 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 103321543127040. Its totient is φ = 19840887636480.
The previous prime is 48972495611203. The next prime is 48972495611267. The reversal of 48972495611228 is 82211659427984.
It is a happy number.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 468705200 + ... + 468809672.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1076266074240).
Almost surely, 248972495611228 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 48972495611228, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (51660771563520).
48972495611228 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (54349047515812).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
48972495611228 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
48972495611228 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 106387 (or 106385 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 139345920, while the sum is 68.
The spelling of 48972495611228 in words is "forty-eight trillion, nine hundred seventy-two billion, four hundred ninety-five million, six hundred eleven thousand, two hundred twenty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •