Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10110010101100100111001… |
… | …11001101011010010000000 |
3 | 20102220210222210000121112001 |
4 | 23022302130321223102000 |
5 | 22414240002330042430 |
6 | 252245205520113344 |
7 | 13226536243062340 |
oct | 1312623471532200 |
9 | 212823883017461 |
10 | 49119878362240 |
11 | 14718694868044 |
12 | 5613917a65854 |
13 | 2153ca53932ba |
14 | c1b5b42c2d20 |
15 | 5a2ac28733ca |
hex | 2cac9ce6b480 |
49119878362240 has 128 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 134383156427520. Its totient is φ = 16818433658880.
The previous prime is 49119878362211. The next prime is 49119878362267. The reversal of 49119878362240 is 4226387891194.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (128).
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (64).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 4049731 + ... + 10707010.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1049868409590).
Almost surely, 249119878362240 is an apocalyptic number.
49119878362240 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (40) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
49119878362240 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (85263278065280).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
49119878362240 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
49119878362240 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 14757510 (or 14757498 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 41803776, while the sum is 64.
The spelling of 49119878362240 in words is "forty-nine trillion, one hundred nineteen billion, eight hundred seventy-eight million, three hundred sixty-two thousand, two hundred forty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •