Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101100000011… |
… | …0101011100000 |
3 | 10221121010211100 |
4 | 3120012223200 |
5 | 104000303324 |
6 | 5342114400 |
7 | 1255343463 |
oct | 330065340 |
9 | 127533740 |
10 | 56650464 |
11 | 29a83372 |
12 | 16b7ba00 |
13 | b9764b0 |
14 | 77492da |
15 | 4e904c9 |
hex | 3606ae0 |
56650464 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 173503512. Its totient is φ = 17429760.
The previous prime is 56650453. The next prime is 56650469. The reversal of 56650464 is 46405665.
It is a happy number.
56650464 is a `hidden beast` number, since 566 + 50 + 46 + 4 = 666.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (72).
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (36).
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (56650469) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 3822 + ... + 11309.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2409771).
Almost surely, 256650464 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
56650464 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (116853048).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
56650464 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
56650464 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 15160 (or 15149 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 86400, while the sum is 36.
The square root of 56650464 is about 7526.6502509416. The cubic root of 56650464 is about 384.0618389993.
The spelling of 56650464 in words is "fifty-six million, six hundred fifty thousand, four hundred sixty-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •