Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100010010111011001… |
… | …0001011100000000000 |
3 | 21001111012111102122100 |
4 | 1010232302023200000 |
5 | 2202120113202042 |
6 | 53523012110400 |
7 | 5221550061414 |
oct | 1045662134000 |
9 | 231435442570 |
10 | 73799350272 |
11 | 2933089a17a |
12 | 12377305400 |
13 | 6c616150cb |
14 | 3801458d44 |
15 | 1dbde4e24c |
hex | 112ec8b800 |
73799350272 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 213146125920. Its totient is φ = 24599777280.
The previous prime is 73799350217. The next prime is 73799350279. The reversal of 73799350272 is 27205399737.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (72).
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (73799350279) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 5 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1983504 + ... + 2020367.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2960362860).
Almost surely, 273799350272 is an apocalyptic number.
73799350272 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (72) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
73799350272 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (139346775648).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
73799350272 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
73799350272 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 4003899 (or 4003876 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 5000940, while the sum is 54.
The spelling of 73799350272 in words is "seventy-three billion, seven hundred ninety-nine million, three hundred fifty thousand, two hundred seventy-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.029 sec. • engine limits •