Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011101010001011111… |
… | …1010100000111110100 |
3 | 201011000110102210020102 |
4 | 2322202333110013310 |
5 | 11240210032031400 |
6 | 232003512253232 |
7 | 20320460266025 |
oct | 2724277240764 |
9 | 634013383212 |
10 | 200303002100 |
11 | 77a47906163 |
12 | 329a10a1218 |
13 | 15b7202b566 |
14 | 99a2436c4c |
15 | 5324d779d5 |
hex | 2ea2fd41f4 |
200303002100 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 438843245568. Its totient is φ = 79352956800.
The previous prime is 200303001971. The next prime is 200303002103. The reversal of 200303002100 is 1200303002.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (200303002103) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 4862189 + ... + 4903211.
Almost surely, 2200303002100 is an apocalyptic number.
200303002100 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (20) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 200303002100, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (219421622784).
200303002100 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (238540243468).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
200303002100 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
200303002100 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 41505 (or 41498 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 36, while the sum is 11.
Adding to 200303002100 its reverse (1200303002), we get a palindrome (201503305102).
The spelling of 200303002100 in words is "two hundred billion, three hundred three million, two thousand, one hundred".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •