Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11101111010110011… |
… | …001001100101000000 |
3 | 10001220211212002100211 |
4 | 131322303021211000 |
5 | 1011243000000000 |
6 | 22431422123504 |
7 | 2215041665062 |
oct | 357263114500 |
9 | 101824762324 |
10 | 32125000000 |
11 | 126957a7a85 |
12 | 6286720594 |
13 | 304c6c7152 |
14 | 17aa761732 |
15 | c8047d7ba |
hex | 77acc9940 |
32125000000 has 140 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 79995108996. Its totient is φ = 12800000000.
The previous prime is 32124999971. The next prime is 32125000027. The reversal of 32125000000 is 52123.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 10 ways, for example, as 6775265344 + 25349734656 = 82312^2 + 159216^2 .
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 19 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 124999872 + ... + 125000128.
Almost surely, 232125000000 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 32125000000, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (39997554498).
32125000000 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (47870108996).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
32125000000 is an frugal number, since it uses more digits than its factorization.
32125000000 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 314 (or 264 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 60, while the sum is 13.
Adding to 32125000000 its reverse (52123), we get a palindrome (32125052123).
The spelling of 32125000000 in words is "thirty-two billion, one hundred twenty-five million", and thus it is an aban number.
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •