Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011110010010111000 |
3 | 201121210220 |
4 | 1132102320 |
5 | 44324412 |
6 | 12140040 |
7 | 3166020 |
oct | 1362270 |
9 | 647726 |
10 | 386232 |
11 | 244200 |
12 | 167620 |
13 | 106a52 |
14 | a0a80 |
15 | 7968c |
hex | 5e4b8 |
386232 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1276800. Its totient is φ = 95040.
The previous prime is 386227. The next prime is 386233. The reversal of 386232 is 232683.
It is a hoax number, since the sum of its digits (24) coincides with the sum of the digits of its distinct prime factors.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (24).
It is a nude number because it is divisible by every one of its digits.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (386233) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 20319 + ... + 20337.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (13300).
2386232 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 386232, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (638400).
386232 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (890568).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
386232 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
386232 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 57 (or 42 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 1728, while the sum is 24.
The square root of 386232 is about 621.4756632403. The cubic root of 386232 is about 72.8253785849.
The spelling of 386232 in words is "three hundred eighty-six thousand, two hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.186 sec. • engine limits •