Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101000010001110… |
… | …0101011010011000 |
3 | 100000211222001211220 |
4 | 3100203211122120 |
5 | 24131220123313 |
6 | 1335111252040 |
7 | 152464626501 |
oct | 32043453230 |
9 | 10024861756 |
10 | 3498989208 |
11 | 15360a7420 |
12 | 81797a020 |
13 | 439ba4520 |
14 | 2529b7ba8 |
15 | 1572ac823 |
hex | d08e5698 |
3498989208 has 128 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 10319339520. Its totient is φ = 974684160.
The previous prime is 3498989161. The next prime is 3498989209. The reversal of 3498989208 is 8029898943.
It is a happy number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (3498989209) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 880041 + ... + 884007.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (80619840).
Almost surely, 23498989208 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 3498989208, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (5159669760).
3498989208 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (6820350312).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
3498989208 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
3498989208 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 4257 (or 4253 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 8957952, while the sum is 60.
The square root of 3498989208 is about 59152.2544625308. The cubic root of 3498989208 is about 1518.1483118730.
The spelling of 3498989208 in words is "three billion, four hundred ninety-eight million, nine hundred eighty-nine thousand, two hundred eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •