Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1111100011111… |
… | …0111000000000 |
3 | 11112211000120120 |
4 | 3320332320000 |
5 | 113202103443 |
6 | 10250540240 |
7 | 1421531232 |
oct | 370767000 |
9 | 145730516 |
10 | 65269248 |
11 | 3392a830 |
12 | 19a37680 |
13 | 106a3475 |
14 | 8950252 |
15 | 5ae4083 |
hex | 3e3ee00 |
65269248 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 189737856. Its totient is φ = 19773440.
The previous prime is 65269241. The next prime is 65269249. The reversal of 65269248 is 84296256.
65269248 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (65269241) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 14965 + ... + 18827.
Almost surely, 265269248 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 65269248, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (94868928).
65269248 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (124468608).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
65269248 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
65269248 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 3895 (or 3879 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 207360, while the sum is 42.
The square root of 65269248 is about 8078.9385441406. The cubic root of 65269248 is about 402.6269763860.
The spelling of 65269248 in words is "sixty-five million, two hundred sixty-nine thousand, two hundred forty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.158 sec. • engine limits •