Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101111101010010010101… |
… | …0010111010111100000000 |
3 | 212012012212011220122122000 |
4 | 1133110211102322330000 |
5 | 1324310310403442032 |
6 | 21533122514544000 |
7 | 1244153164324521 |
oct | 137244522727400 |
9 | 25165764818560 |
10 | 6550450843392 |
11 | 20a6037805245 |
12 | 899630898000 |
13 | 386921781111 |
14 | 189087580848 |
15 | b55d3d18e7c |
hex | 5f5254baf00 |
6550450843392 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 19370835558480. Its totient is φ = 2183483612160.
The previous prime is 6550450843369. The next prime is 6550450843429. The reversal of 6550450843392 is 2933480540556.
It is a happy number.
6550450843392 is a `hidden beast` number, since 6 + 5 + 5 + 0 + 4 + 508 + 43 + 3 + 92 = 666.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (72).
It is a super-2 number, since 2×65504508433922 (a number of 26 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (54).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 473839359 + ... + 473853182.
Almost surely, 26550450843392 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
6550450843392 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (12820384715088).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
6550450843392 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
6550450843392 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 947692566 (or 947692546 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 15552000, while the sum is 54.
The spelling of 6550450843392 in words is "six trillion, five hundred fifty billion, four hundred fifty million, eight hundred forty-three thousand, three hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.085 sec. • engine limits •