Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011101111111… |
… | …10011001000000 |
3 | 20212110100021210 |
4 | 11313332121000 |
5 | 200212401202 |
6 | 13440250120 |
7 | 2304512430 |
oct | 567763100 |
9 | 225410253 |
10 | 98559552 |
11 | 506a8283 |
12 | 29010940 |
13 | 1755ac80 |
14 | d1382c0 |
15 | 89bcc6c |
hex | 5dfe640 |
98559552 has 112 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 321007232. Its totient is φ = 25989120.
The previous prime is 98559551. The next prime is 98559589. The reversal of 98559552 is 25595589.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (112).
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (48).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (98559551) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 14652 + ... + 20292.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2866136).
Almost surely, 298559552 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 98559552, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (160503616).
98559552 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (222447680).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
98559552 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
98559552 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 5676 (or 5666 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 810000, while the sum is 48.
The square root of 98559552 is about 9927.7163537241. The cubic root of 98559552 is about 461.9194402366.
The spelling of 98559552 in words is "ninety-eight million, five hundred fifty-nine thousand, five hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.070 sec. • engine limits •