Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011100001001… |
… | …10001011010000 |
3 | 20201211002002001 |
4 | 11300212023100 |
5 | 144214002420 |
6 | 13331003344 |
7 | 2252205406 |
oct | 560461320 |
9 | 221732061 |
10 | 96625360 |
11 | 4a5a7077 |
12 | 28439554 |
13 | 17031790 |
14 | cb93476 |
15 | 8739b0a |
hex | 5c262d0 |
96625360 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 246640464. Its totient is φ = 34983936.
The previous prime is 96625337. The next prime is 96625379. The reversal of 96625360 is 6352669.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 8 ways, for example, as 19044496 + 77580864 = 4364^2 + 8808^2 .
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (80).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 54244 + ... + 55996.
Almost surely, 296625360 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 96625360, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (123320232).
96625360 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (150015104).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
96625360 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
96625360 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1832 (or 1826 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 58320, while the sum is 37.
The square root of 96625360 is about 9829.8199373132. The cubic root of 96625360 is about 458.8777938166.
The spelling of 96625360 in words is "ninety-six million, six hundred twenty-five thousand, three hundred sixty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.092 sec. • engine limits •