Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100101111010… |
… | …11001111110110 |
3 | 21110002112201220 |
4 | 12113223033312 |
5 | 204324313000 |
6 | 14334331210 |
7 | 2435243421 |
oct | 627531766 |
9 | 243075656 |
10 | 106869750 |
11 | 55363909 |
12 | 2b959b06 |
13 | 191aa650 |
14 | 1029c9b8 |
15 | 95b01a0 |
hex | 65eb3f6 |
106869750 has 128 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 292795776. Its totient is φ = 25804800.
The previous prime is 106869713. The next prime is 106869767. The reversal of 106869750 is 57968601.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1068697502 = 22842286930125000, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 63 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 945694 + ... + 945806.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2287467).
Almost surely, 2106869750 is an apocalyptic number.
106869750 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 106869750, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (146397888).
106869750 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (185926026).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
106869750 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
106869750 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 243 (or 233 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 90720, while the sum is 42.
The square root of 106869750 is about 10337.7826442618. The cubic root of 106869750 is about 474.5532271848.
The spelling of 106869750 in words is "one hundred six million, eight hundred sixty-nine thousand, seven hundred fifty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.078 sec. • engine limits •