Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1000110100011001010110… |
… | …0100000100111001100000 |
3 | 1021022221201100212022202200 |
4 | 2031012111210010321200 |
5 | 2232330410103341004 |
6 | 32342221310013200 |
7 | 2020350060641553 |
oct | 215062544047140 |
9 | 37287640768680 |
10 | 9696250449504 |
11 | 30a917a663a63 |
12 | 11072467a7200 |
13 | 5544775773a8 |
14 | 25743002c69a |
15 | 11c34d4d1239 |
hex | 8d195904e60 |
9696250449504 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 28524529902960. Its totient is φ = 3120632325888.
The previous prime is 9696250449499. The next prime is 9696250449511. The reversal of 9696250449504 is 4059440526969.
9696250449504 is a `hidden beast` number, since 9 + 6 + 96 + 2 + 50 + 4 + 495 + 0 + 4 = 666.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (72).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 580466412 + ... + 580483115.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (396174026430).
Almost surely, 29696250449504 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
9696250449504 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (18828279453456).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
9696250449504 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9696250449504 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1160949572 (or 1160949561 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 83980800, while the sum is 63.
The spelling of 9696250449504 in words is "nine trillion, six hundred ninety-six billion, two hundred fifty million, four hundred forty-nine thousand, five hundred four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.075 sec. • engine limits •